This also connects with the move toward community based approaches to death, dying and bereavement [ 69 ]. Specifically, an awareness by general practitioners and primary care health practitioners of the potential vulnerability of bereaved people up to four years post loss could allow them to be more proactive in recognition of grief-related presentations and providing subsequent support. There are several limitations to our study.
First, since our results rely on data from self-completion questionnaires, we may overestimate the gender effect due to self-reporting bias; females may be more willing to recognise and acknowledge health problems than males. Second, we were unable to determine from the data whether respondents developed uncomplicated or complicated grief, which has clinical significance, particularly following its inclusion as a new diagnostic criteria in DSM-V [ 14 , 70 ]. Third, the data do not provide detailed information about the nature and causes of death which can be important risk factors driving the intensity of grief [ 71 , 72 ].
From Genius to Madness
For example, violent death [ 73 , 74 ], unnatural death [ 75 ] and unexpectedness or unpreparedness of death [ 37 , 76 , 77 ] can increase the chance of developing complicated grief, and hence some of the bio-psychosocial impacts reported in this paper. Bereavement often leads to psychological distress, yet to date there has been a lack of robust data which demonstrates the impact following the death of a close friend.
Bereavement of a close friend is a type of disenfranchised grief. Drawing on the theory of psychological kinship we demonstrated that bereaved females experience more negative and long-lasting bereavement outcomes. Specifically, they experience a substantial fall in vitality, suffered more deterioration in mental health, impaired role-emotional and social functioning than male counterparts for up to four years.
Our results showed that people who were not socially active suffered significant adverse physical and psychological well-being, inferior mental health and social functioning. For respondents who were socially engaged, they received support from other friends and relatives during bereavement, and thus the negative impact was somewhat moderated.
- Religion, Personality, and Mental Health | SpringerLink.
- Subfields of psychology - Wikipedia;
- Hold Me (In Your Arms);
- The Mental Health Benefits of Religion & Spirituality.
- McLean Main Navigation?
Overall, we presented robust evidence that the death of a close friend matters. The findings have international applicability regarding the impact of bereavement on close friends. The data suggest the need to ensure services are able to assist people who have experienced the death of a friend to develop support networks. Non-bereaved group is reweighted using the Entropy Balancing EB procedure so that the distribution mean, variance and skewness of the socio-demographic variables are matched to the bereaved group.
We report the coefficient of the dummy variable DEATH , which equals 1 if the respondent experienced death in the relevant time period. We report the coefficient of the dummy variable DEATH, which equals 1 if the respondent experienced death in the relevant time period. Browse Subject Areas?
Miguel Farias — Coventry University
Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this paper. Introduction In most circumstances, grief is a natural response to bereavement.
Survey participants Survey participants are interviewed and followed annually. Download: PPT.
Religion, Personality, and Mental Health
Methodology One of the challenges in this study was to match the two groups of respondents those that were bereaved and those that were not given that there are a multitude of factors affecting the bereavement outcome. Fig 1. Short term and long term impact of death of a friend over time. Table 4. Impact of death of a close friend on vitality, mental health, general health, role emotional and social functioning across level of social activity. Table 5.
Impact of death of a close friend on vitality, mental health, general health, role emotional and social functioning across gender. Discussion Our results offer, for the first time, insight into the bio-psychosocial impacts of the death of a close friend. Conclusion Bereavement often leads to psychological distress, yet to date there has been a lack of robust data which demonstrates the impact following the death of a close friend.
Supporting information. S1 Table. Impact of death of a close friend on vitality, mental health, general health, role emotional and social functioning across level of social activity full results. S2 Table. Impact of death of a close friend on vitality, mental health, general health, role emotional and social functioning across Gender full results. References 1. Sanders CM. Comparison of younger and older spouses in bereavement outcome. View Article Google Scholar 2. The measurement of grief: age and sex variation.
Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. View Article Google Scholar 3. Sable P. Attachment, loss of spouse, and grief in elderly adults. View Article Google Scholar 4. Archer J. The nature of grief: The evolution and psychology of reactions to loss: Routledge; Rosenblatt PC. Grief in small-scale societies.
In: Parkes PL C. Death and bereavement across cultures. London: Routledge; Individual and situational differences in recovery from bereavement: A risk group identified. Journal of Social Issues. View Article Google Scholar 7. Do positive psychological states shed light on recovery from bereavement? Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. Death studies. The role of daily positive emotions during conjugal bereavement. View Article Google Scholar 9.
Religion and bereavement: A conceptual framework. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. View Article Google Scholar Do religious or spiritual beliefs influence bereavement? A systematic review.
Palliative medicine. Religion and spirituality in adjustment following bereavement: An integrative review. The role of religion in bereavement.
Resilience rather than recovery: A contextual framework on adaptation following bereavement. Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet. The role of social support in bereavement. Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research, and intervention: Cambridge University Press; Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect.
American journal of Orthopsychiatry.
Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life: Routledge; Stroebe MS, Stroebe W. The mortality of bereavement: A review. Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention: American Psychological Association; The prediction of bereavement outcome: Development of an integrative risk factor framework. Predictors of complicated grief: a systematic review of empirical studies. Risk factors for bereavement outcome: A multivariate approach.
Beyond normality in the study of bereavement: Heterogeneity in depression outcomes following loss in older adults. Predictors of complicated grief and depression in bereaved caregivers: a nationwide prospective cohort study. Journal of pain and symptom management.
Doka K. Disenfranchised Grief: Recognizing Hidden Sorrow. London, MD: Lexington Books. Corr CA. Enhancing the concept of disenfranchised grief. Sibling bereavement in late life. Fitzpatrick TR.